Pankaj
Jalote
Head,
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
In IITK, the Head of a unit (IIT, Department, Center, …) is the point of contact for all administrative
matters relating to that unit who passes papers and information between his
unit and rest of the organization through available and established mechanisms,
and performs the statutory tasks. In short, the Head is viewed as, and is
expected to act as, primarily an administrator.
There is no doubt that efficient administering is
essential for smooth functioning of any organization. But, can an organization be
vibrant and dynamic with the primary role of the Head being administering of
his unit? If individuals and the organization are to achieve greater heights,
the goals and aims of the organization, its units, and its people must keep
getting higher, and a Head must play the role of the leader taking his unit to
the higher goals. If this is viewed as the main role of the Head, and the
performance of his unit is his primary performance indicator, then it matters
less how productive a Head is himself; what matters more is how productive his
unit is as a whole. Of course, it helps if the personal output of the Head is
also good as besides contributing to the output of the unit it also gives him
moral authority to head the unit.
As an academic institute/unit is not a cohesive unit with
clearly defined unit objective, the best a Head can do is to facilitate
achieving of higher goals by individuals, and facilitate development of groups
to leverage complimentary strengths and expertise. A basic goal of an individual-oriented
system should be to help individuals realize their potential through individual
and group activity.
There is no doubt that most IITs have faculty and staff
that have tremendous capability. But equally true is the fact that most have
not realized anywhere near their potential, if we look at quality and quantity of the output.
This is less of a failure of the individuals, but more a failure of its various
Heads, and of the overall system that expects and encourages Heads to be mere
administrators, and not leaders helping individuals to raise their expectation
levels and encouraging groups to be formed.
The biggest challenge for a Head in IITs today is to encourage individuals and
small groups to dream and then facilitate the transformation of dreams into
reality. That is, encourage setting of high goals by individuals and groups of
individuals, and then use administrative means to facilitate achieving of these
higher goals. With this, administering becomes a tool and an aid to achieve
higher objectives. Without a guiding vision, administering is an unexciting
chore, making the Head essentially a glorified clerk.
Ultimately, the Head should be in a position where he
takes pride in, and “boasts about”, not what he has achieved, but what his
colleagues in his unit have achieved. This perhaps is the hardest task for a
Head in an individualistic system like ours where individual aspirations are
the basic driving force. But when given the role of a Head, the individual must
rise above his self and view his success as the growth and rise of his
colleagues.
This brings us to the question, why should a Head do this?
This can only be done if suitable incentives and disincentives are systemically
supported for a Head to perform as a leader of a group. This, unfortunately, is
not easy given that we have few evaluative mechanisms in place, do not have
clearly articulated roles and responsibilities, have
no stated performance indicators for different Heads, etc. With the lack of
clarity of purpose and lack of mechanisms to support it, Heads do seem to be
encouraged to remain as administrators – as long as the papers are acted upon
quickly and the general response time to requests is short, a Head is
considered a good Head. This clearly is
not enough – it is relying too much on individuals to take the unit and the
organization to greater heights. Only if the fundamental difference between an
individual faculty member and a Head is realized by most of the Heads, and is
systemically supported, can our institute become one that helps individuals
realize their potential, and in the process achieve greater heights.
|